Rejectors

Rejectors are individuals or groups who refuse to accept, approve, or endorse a particular idea, belief, proposal, or item. This term often indicates a willingness to dismiss something based on a critical evaluation or personal standards, and may be applied in various contexts, including social, political, and market environments.

Rejectors meaning with examples

• The rejectors of the new policy voiced their concerns during the town hall meeting, emphasizing the potential negative impact on the community. Their argument focused on the lack of adequate research supporting the proposed changes and the possible financial implications for residents, highlighting their skepticism regarding the decision-making process.
• In the world of fashion, rejectors often play a crucial role in shaping trends. They may dismiss certain styles or designs as unappealing, influencing designers to rethink their creations. This process helps maintain a dialogue between creators and consumers, ensuring that only the most relevant and desirable fashions gain traction in the market.
• During the academic conference, several rejectors of the proposed framework for social research raised significant questions. Their critiques centered on ethical considerations and the robustness of the methodology, pushing for more transparency and a reevaluation of the proposed guidelines to better align with established ethical standards in research.
• Online platforms have seen a rise in rejectors who critique product reviews. These individuals often discredit overly positive feedback, arguing that it lacks authenticity. Through detailed analyses, they seek to provide a more balanced view, helping potential buyers make informed decisions by highlighting both the strengths and weaknesses of the products.
• The movie's rejectors were quick to express their dissatisfaction with its plot and character development. Many took to social media to share their opinions, sparking a debate about the film's artistic choices and overall impact. This backlash served as a catalyst for discussions about audience expectations and narrative quality in contemporary cinema.