Rejoinders

Rejoinders, plural of rejoinder, refer to a reply or response, especially a sharp or witty one, to a previous statement or remark. It signifies an answer, often argumentative or defensive, in a conversation or debate. rejoinders aim to counter an argument, clarify a point, or defend against an accusation. They frequently showcase quick thinking and skillful use of language. While straightforward responses exist, a rejoinder often implies a degree of cleverness or pointedness, serving to challenge or deflect the initial statement effectively. The effectiveness of a rejoinder lies in its ability to address the core issue succinctly and persuasively. Therefore, in essence, rejoinders are tools for conversational engagement, which can shift the direction and even the tone of an exchange.

Rejoinders meaning with examples

• After her opponent accused her of misleading the public, the politician offered a series of biting rejoinders, pointing out inconsistencies in his own record. She meticulously presented evidence to support her counterclaims, deftly deflecting his accusations. The audience was captivated by her swiftness. She successfully shifted the conversation towards his past failings, successfully turning the tables.
• During the heated debate about climate change, the scientist's detailed explanation was immediately followed by the industry representative’s sharp rejoinders. The rejoinders challenged the scientist's data, and questioned the economic feasibility of their solutions. The back-and-forth highlighted the complexities of the issue and the fundamental disagreements at stake. The rejoinders were often aggressive, even personal at times.
• The comedian, known for his quick wit, was bombarded with heckles from the crowd. Without hesitation, he fired back with hilarious rejoinders, deflating the hecklers’ attacks and keeping the audience in stitches. His mastery of improv and his well-timed rejoinders maintained the comedic flow and strengthened his connection with the appreciative audience. His reactions proved popular with the audience.
• In the email thread discussing the project's delays, the project manager's criticism prompted several angry rejoinders from team members. They accused the manager of poor communication and unreasonable expectations, defending their own contributions. These rejoinders illustrated the team's frustration. They escalated the conflict and delayed progress further. All parties were at fault.
• The lawyer expertly crafted his courtroom strategy with detailed rejoinders to the opposing counsel's arguments. His strategic remarks addressed key points of contention, undermining the other side's narrative. His calculated rejoinders challenged the reliability of the witnesses and shifted the focus to weaknesses in their arguments. His careful planning paid off.