Seditiousness

Seditiousness refers to the quality or state of inciting or promoting rebellion against the authority of a state or government. It encompasses actions, speech, or writings that encourage resistance or insurrection against established political structures, often perceived as a threat to public order or governmental stability. Seditious conduct can lead to serious legal repercussions, as it is seen as an affront to civic order and authority.

Seditiousness meaning with examples

• The government's crackdown on seditiousness revealed its increasing intolerance towards any form of dissent, raising concerns about the erosion of civil liberties in the name of national security. Activists were arrested for merely expressing their opposition, highlighting the delicate balance between preserving order and protecting free speech.
• In the novel, the protagonist's seditiousness is portrayed through his underground network that disseminates pamphlets against the regime. His actions reflect a deep-seated desire for change and a belief that the oppressive government must be challenged, even at great personal risk, illustrating the power of grassroots movements.
• During the college debate, students passionately argued about the boundaries of seditiousness. While some classified certain protests as harmless expressions of free speech, others warned that inciting rebellion, even in the guise of activism, could lead to larger societal disruptions, showcasing the complexity of political discourse.
• The historical account outlined various instances of seditiousness against colonial rule, where citizens united to challenge oppressive laws. Their acts of defiance sought not only independence but also the broader principles of democracy and self-determination, exemplifying how ordinary people can influence the course of history.
• Legal experts debated the implications of seditiousness in the context of the recent court case. The defendant was charged with inciting violence through social media posts, raising questions about the definition of free expression and the limits of acceptable dissent, prompting discussions on the protection versus regulation of speech.