Sinew-lacking

Describing a person, animal, object, or concept deficient in strength, vigor, resilience, or the capacity for sustained effort. This adjective implies a fundamental weakness or fragility, a lack of the underlying connective tissues (metaphorically sinews) that provide support and enable function. It suggests an absence of robustness, stamina, or the inherent qualities necessary for enduring challenge or hardship. This sinew-lacking quality could manifest in physical, mental, or even abstract domains, such as arguments or political systems, lacking the strength to withstand pressure or adversity.

Sinew-lacking meaning with examples

• The emaciated stray dog, with its sinew-lacking frame, shivered relentlessly in the biting wind. His inability to forage for food, coupled with his weakened state, rendered him vulnerable to the elements and predators. A single misstep would have been his end. His survival depended entirely on the mercy of strangers and any meager food they would be willing to give.
• His sinew-lacking excuse for why he missed his deadline, a flimsy tale of technical difficulties, failed to impress his supervisor. The constant delays and a general lack of preparedness showed a deeper problem. His project, which would likely crumble under slight pressure, would surely disappoint their client. Therefore, the excuse was considered poor, as he was lacking the ability to make a convincing claim.
• The nation's economic policy was described as sinew-lacking, its foundations fragile and unable to weather the looming financial storm. Despite attempts to stabilize, the government failed to reinforce its base, unable to implement tough decisions. Without any reform, the country's stability was in danger. These fundamental weaknesses made it unable to bounce back with the changing markets.
• Her sinew-lacking argument, filled with logical fallacies and unsupported claims, collapsed under the slightest scrutiny. Despite the speaker's attempt to add strength to the speech, her logic failed to support her claims, and it could not survive her opponent's counterarguments. The inherent weakness of her reasoning made it easy to disprove her theories and statements, rendering it completely ineffective.