Sprawl-embracing

Sprawl-embracing describes a tendency or characteristic that either favors, supports, or actively participates in the expansion of urban or suburban areas characterized by low-density development, car dependency, and often fragmented land use. It encompasses the adoption of lifestyle choices and planning philosophies that contribute to or benefit from this outward growth. This can include everything from individual home purchases in suburban areas to policies that encourage road construction and discourage public transportation. The term often carries a negative connotation, highlighting the potential environmental, social, and economic consequences of unchecked sprawl, such as increased pollution, traffic congestion, and social segregation.

Sprawl-embracing meaning with examples

• The new highway project, designed to alleviate traffic congestion, was unfortunately a Sprawl-embracing initiative that would likely encourage more residential development further from the city center, and, paradoxically, worsen congestion in the long run. The project aimed to reduce local traffic but instead increased distances, which would have resulted in a longer commute for city residents.
• Sarah's decision to buy a large house with a sprawling lawn in the suburbs was a Sprawl-embracing choice. It meant she was signing up for a longer commute, increased reliance on her car, and a lifestyle that contributed to the expansion of low-density, car-dependent development that she loved. The area's lack of sidewalks didn't concern her.
• The planning commission's approval of a zoning ordinance that prioritized single-family homes over denser housing options was a Sprawl-embracing policy that aimed to boost local businesses. The decision prioritized land use. This decision meant more car-dependent development and contributed to the expansion of suburban areas, which would have affected the future development.
• The real estate developer's business model was inherently Sprawl-embracing, focusing on acquiring large tracts of land on the periphery of the city to build large subdivisions and shopping centers, all designed to cater to a car-centric lifestyle that the developer was confident in. His plans would have negatively impacted existing businesses.
• Despite the city's stated commitment to sustainable development, their decision to continue investing in highway infrastructure and limited public transport options remained a Sprawl-embracing approach. These choices reflected an endorsement of suburban development over urban density, leading to negative consequences for the climate.