Sycophancy

Sycophancy is the act of fawning over someone in power, using flattery and subservience to gain favor or advantage. It often involves insincere praise, exaggerated displays of deference, and a willingness to agree with anything the superior says, regardless of truth or reason. This behavior is typically motivated by self-interest, such as career advancement, social status, or material gain. A sycophant prioritizes personal benefit over integrity and genuine belief, cultivating a parasitic relationship with the object of their flattery. The term carries a strong negative connotation, portraying the individual as manipulative and lacking in authenticity. The motivation is often to manipulate and exploit those in positions of power.

Sycophancy meaning with examples

• During the company meeting, John's constant compliments on the CEO's ideas, even when they were clearly flawed, bordered on sycophancy. His exaggerated praise seemed designed to impress and climb the corporate ladder, rather than offer constructive feedback. Others rolled their eyes, realizing his strategy for advancement came at the expense of honest communication. The team knew he would agree to anything for a promotion.
• In the royal court, Sycophancy was rampant; courtiers competed to offer the most extravagant flattery to the king, hoping to secure grants, titles, or positions. These flattering performances aimed to win the king's favor, resulting in distorted opinions and poor decision-making as those in court avoided any challenge or truth. This constant display revealed that those in power became isolated from reality.
• The political aide was known for his Sycophancy towards the senator, consistently echoing the politician's opinions and dismissing any dissenting views. His unwavering support, regardless of the senator's actions or statements, earned him access and influence. However, he sacrificed his own values. This servile behavior fueled the political machine but undermined honest discourse and debate, making for an echo chamber of propaganda.
• The aspiring artist's excessive flattery of the established art critic was a transparent attempt at sycophancy. He showered the critic with praise for every painting, even those he privately considered mediocre. Hoping to get a good review for his own upcoming exhibition, he suppressed his true aesthetic judgements. The reviewer saw through the behavior as a ploy and had no interest.