Un-scholarly

Describing something that lacks the qualities expected of scholarly work, research, or behavior. This includes a disregard for established academic standards, a lack of rigorous methodology, or a superficial treatment of a subject matter. It often implies a lack of depth, intellectual curiosity, or proper citation and referencing. The term can also refer to behavior or writing that is not befitting of an academic environment, such as being unprofessional, overly subjective, or flippant. It can also be used to describe research lacking a foundation, or poorly constructed arguments without credible data. This can further describe the lack of engagement with relevant literature.

Un-scholarly meaning with examples

• The online forum's discussion, filled with unsubstantiated claims and personal attacks, was deemed un-scholarly by the professor. It lacked the critical analysis and evidence-based reasoning expected in an academic setting. The participants failed to cite sources or engage with established research, making the debate shallow and unproductive, which failed to add any form of credibility. The un-scholarly content ultimately hindered any possible productive discussion.
• Her hastily written blog post, lacking proper citations and critical analysis, was considered un-scholarly. She offered opinions without backing them up with verifiable evidence or engaging with existing literature on the topic. Her lack of rigor and reliance on generalizations undermined her credibility and made her arguments appear superficial, which ultimately took away from the impact of her writing. This un-scholarly writing style ultimately fell short of the expectations of an academic audience.
• His presentation at the conference was marked by un-scholarly behavior. The presenter used anecdotal evidence and did not use established academic sources and research methods, with no form of structure or organization. He used a flippant tone and dismissed opposing viewpoints without providing counterarguments. This un-scholarly approach significantly diminished the value of his presentation and raised questions about his academic integrity and knowledge.
• The book, with its numerous factual errors and absence of proper footnotes, was widely criticized as un-scholarly. Its lack of attention to detail and citation standards made its claims suspect, ultimately questioning the author's research methodology. The publication was seen by many as more interested in sensationalism rather than rigorous academic pursuits, leading to a lack of academic respect and validity. The overall un-scholarly nature detracted from any potential academic impact.
• The reviewer labeled the student's essay un-scholarly due to its reliance on plagiarism and a lack of original thought. The essay failed to engage with the course readings or formulate any new insights on the topic and had many missed requirements. The absence of intellectual curiosity and any demonstration of independent research indicated a lack of seriousness and respect for academic integrity, rendering it insufficient for any reasonable grade.