Unauthorizedness

Unauthorizedness refers to the state or quality of lacking official permission or authorization, particularly concerning an action, access, or use of something. It implies a transgression against established rules, laws, or protocols governing what is permissible. This condition indicates a breach of authority, a deviation from accepted norms, or a circumstance where permission has not been granted. The term underscores the illegitimacy or improperness of an action, highlighting the absence of valid consent or approval from the appropriate authorities. It conveys a sense of transgression or an activity that is not sanctioned and, therefore, potentially subject to consequences or legal ramifications. It implies a failure to adhere to pre-set protocols or to get permission before undertaking something.

Unauthorizedness meaning with examples

• The company's cybersecurity protocols detected unauthorizedness, as an employee attempted to access sensitive financial records without the proper credentials. This triggered an immediate alert, preventing a potential data breach and protecting crucial information from falling into the wrong hands. Immediate action was taken to prevent any damage or information loss.
• The archaeologists faced accusations of unauthorizedness, when they began excavating at a historical site without securing the required permits from the local government and heritage authorities. Their actions, deemed a violation of preservation laws, endangered the delicate historical artifacts and angered the local population. Legal issues arose immediately.
• After the scandal broke, the team was in complete shock with the unauthorizedness of the politician’s actions; it was quickly revealed that he was involved in insider trading, accessing confidential market data and using it for personal gain, a flagrant abuse of power. This resulted in resignations and investigations.
• Investigators discovered the unauthorizedness of the system administrator's access to users' private emails, a clear violation of privacy and data protection regulations. This blatant disregard for confidentiality, in a company with a strong policy against this sort of practice, led to serious consequences and damaged the trust of the entire company.
• The board expressed deep concern over the unauthorizedness of the funds that were reportedly used to cover up previous bad actions of the CEO, further damaging the already deteriorating company image. This misuse of the resources was deemed a criminal act. The CEO had the company lose trust and financial status.