Vetoed

To officially reject or prohibit a proposal, law, or action, especially by a person with the authority to do so. This act prevents the proposal from taking effect. The word often implies a decisive and final decision, preventing further consideration or enactment, at least in its original form. This power is typically wielded by executives or legislatures to overrule or nullify decisions made by other branches of government. It can also be used in other contexts to signify an outright refusal to accept or approve something. The use of a veto can have significant political and social ramifications, often shaping the course of legislation and policy.

Vetoed meaning with examples

• The President Vetoed the climate change bill, citing concerns about its economic impact. This action effectively stopped the bill's progress, sparking a heated debate in Congress and among environmental advocacy groups. The veto demonstrated the President's strong opposition and solidified his policy stance on environmental regulations. The future of the bill remains uncertain.
• The UN Security Council Vetoed a resolution calling for sanctions against the warring factions, leading to accusations of bias and hindering efforts to mediate the conflict. This critical decision by one of the five permanent members blocked a key pathway towards achieving peace and intensified international scrutiny of the council's effectiveness, and the countries involved.
• The Board of Directors Vetoed the CEO's proposed acquisition of a struggling competitor, due to financial risk. The board's rejection of the plan, based on unfavorable expert financial advice, prevented significant organizational risk exposure. The veto highlighted the board's oversight role and demonstrated its ability to act in the organization's best interest and for its financial solvency.
• The referee Vetoed the winning touchdown after review. The referee, using instant replay, discovered an illegal block, rendering the score invalid and changing the game's outcome. This intervention by the officiating staff led to a controversial call which sparked immediate outrage from the losing side's fans who felt that this was unfair.
• After reviewing the initial designs, the architect Vetoed the proposed exterior, citing aesthetic incompatibilities with the surrounding landscape and an improper selection of building materials. The architect's rejection necessitated a complete redesign, and the project was set back several months, leading to further considerations.