Vitriolically

Adverb describing the manner of expressing something with bitter criticism or malevolence, typically characterized by harsh and caustic language. The term is derived from 'vitriol', meaning something that is severely corrosive or harmful, and often indicates an intense form of disdain or contempt directed at a person or idea. When used, 'vitriolically' suggests that the speaker's tone and choice of words are deliberately cutting and often aimed to inflict emotional hurt or denigration.

Vitriolically meaning with examples

• During the debate, the candidate spoke vitriolically about his opponent's past decisions, hoping to discredit him in the eyes of voters. His tone was filled with such anger that many in the audience were left uncomfortable, sensing the bitterness beneath his words. Instead of focusing on his own policies, he resorted to harsh criticisms, which overshadowed any constructive dialogue. The fallout from his remarks left a bitter taste in the minds of supporters who valued civil discourse.
• Her reviews were often written vitriolically, where she did not shy away from vocally criticizing the artistic choices of filmmakers. She dissected their work with a severity that left no doubt about her feelings; her disdain was palpable through her sharp word choices. Instead of highlighting any positives, her focus was solely on belittling their efforts. While some found her insights refreshing, others thought her approach alienated potential audiences who might appreciate the art.
• The columnist's articles became increasingly vitriolic, turning from mild critiques into personal attacks. Readers noted how her disdain transformed her writing, making it less about the issues and more about humiliating individuals involved. This used to be a space for thoughtful discourse, but her change in tone made it difficult for many to engage positively. Instead of fostering change, her approach bred division and resentment among those she should have inspired to seek improvement.
• At the meeting, he spoke vitriolically about the new policy, questioning the competence of those who had proposed it with scathing remarks. His frustration boiled over, transforming constructive feedback into a relentless stream of negativity that resonated throughout the room. While he had valid concerns, the manner in which he expressed them deterred others from contributing positively to the discussion. His choice of aggressive language did not facilitate solutions but rather fostered an atmosphere of defensiveness.