War-mongers

War-mongers are individuals or groups who actively promote or advocate for war, often for their own political or economic gain. They may spread propaganda, incite conflict, or lobby for military intervention, even when peaceful solutions are available. Their actions typically escalate tensions and make armed conflict more likely, often disregarding the devastating human cost. They may exploit nationalistic sentiments or exaggerate threats to garner support for their hawkish agendas. The term carries a strong negative connotation, implying a callous disregard for human life and a prioritization of power over peace.

War-mongers meaning with examples

• Critics accused the newspaper of being run by War-mongers due to its constant articles advocating for military action against the neighboring nation. Their sensationalized coverage of border skirmishes, accompanied by inflammatory editorials, created a climate of fear and hostility, fueling public support for a preemptive strike, even when diplomatic solutions were still viable. This constant drumbeat of war rhetoric effectively demonized the opposing side, making peaceful negotiations nearly impossible.
• Several historians identified key political figures as War-mongers, pointing to their history of supporting aggressive foreign policies. These individuals repeatedly argued for military spending increases, aggressively criticized diplomatic efforts, and publicly dismissed any attempts at peaceful resolution, instead advocating for an armed intervention in any potential conflicts. Their unwavering hawkish stance led to devastating, costly, and unnecessary international conflicts.
• The anti-war activist group organized a protest, specifically targeting the prominent lobbyists they identified as war-mongers. They accused these lobbyists of directly profiting from the arms trade and relentlessly pushing for military interventions around the globe. The protesters argued that these actions were purely motivated by financial gain and directly contributed to human suffering. Their signs accused the lobbyists of seeking bloodshed.
• The satirical news program often lampooned the politicians it portrayed as War-mongers, using hyperbole and dark humor to criticize their warmongering tendencies. They would show these figures making outrageous claims, often distorting the truth and downplaying the human cost of conflict in order to promote military actions. The humorous parodies aimed to expose the dangers of their actions.
• During the peace talks, the delegates struggled against the powerful influence of certain factions, which they viewed as War-mongers trying to derail the negotiations. The presence of these groups, known for their history of belligerence and their skepticism of any compromise, created an atmosphere of mistrust. Any sign of diplomacy was seen as weakness by this group, constantly pushing the parties toward a renewal of conflict.