Western-biased

Western-biased describes a perspective, viewpoint, or system that favors or privileges Western cultures, values, and historical narratives over those of other cultures or regions. This bias often manifests through the selective presentation of information, prioritizing Western contributions, or judging other societies based on Western standards. It implies a lack of neutrality and can result in misrepresentation, misunderstanding, and the marginalization of non-Western experiences. This bias can permeate various fields including education, media, international relations, and historical analysis, shaping our understanding of the world in a potentially skewed way.

Western-biased meaning with examples

• The history textbook presented a Western-biased account of the Industrial Revolution, focusing heavily on European innovation while largely ignoring the contributions of other regions to earlier technological advancements, painting a skewed perspective for the reader. This one sided view leads to a limited understanding of true development across the planet
• News coverage often displayed a Western-biased viewpoint, framing events in certain countries through a particular lens, which overlooked local context and potentially fueled misconceptions. This means media may make rash judgments on other societies based on Western standards. Leading to division among nations.
• Critics argued that the museum's exhibition was Western-biased, showcasing primarily European art and artifacts with little representation of other artistic traditions, diminishing the artistic contributions from other civilizations, a problem for non western-based artists.
• The international organization’s policies seemed Western-biased, imposing regulations and solutions which did not adequately consider the specific needs and circumstances of developing nations, an obstacle which limits their capabilities and affects development
• The academic research suffered from a Western-biased approach, relying heavily on Western theories and methodologies while neglecting or devaluing alternative frameworks. This leads to flawed research that cannot be relied on, potentially damaging the academic field.