Admissible

In law and other fields, 'admissible' describes evidence, information, or arguments that are considered acceptable or valid for consideration. It signifies that the material meets established standards and criteria, such as relevance, reliability, and proper procedures for presentation. Generally, only admissible information can be presented in court proceedings or used in a process of assessment or decision-making. It's often contrasted with evidence or information deemed 'inadmissible,' meaning it's not allowed to be used because it is, for instance, irrelevant, unreliable, or obtained improperly. The concept is essential to maintaining fairness and ensuring that conclusions are based on sound foundations.

Admissible meaning with examples

• The lawyer argued that the video recording of the incident was admissible as it directly showed the events in question. The judge reviewed the evidence, considering whether the chain of custody was unbroken and if its authenticity was verified. After careful deliberation, the court ruled that the video would be allowed for consideration in court as it met all requirements. The defense attorney questioned the validity of the video in an attempt to get it thrown out as evidence.
• During the application process, only documentation that is admissible will be accepted. This includes your transcripts and your resume but does not include your childhood drawings. The screening committee has strict guidelines about what forms of proof or background information will be considered. Anything that fails to meet requirements will be discarded. All submitted information is carefully verified.
• The scientist conducted an experiment using established methods to gather admissible data. Every step was rigorously recorded. Any results obtained without following the standard protocol were considered inadmissible and discarded from the final analysis. Only data sets with the proper provenance are allowed, so all data are verifiable to ensure the findings are reliable. These methods are imperative to maintaining ethical standards.
• The committee was evaluating proposals, and only the ideas meeting all pre-specified criteria would be deemed admissible. The proposal needed to have certain sections in order to be considered. Some submissions might be rejected instantly, for instance if they did not follow format requirements, or exceeded the word limits. The goal was to ensure the highest quality proposals.
• The expert's testimony was considered admissible because he had relevant experience and expertise. It addressed the issues that the jury would be weighing, and it conformed to the rules of evidence established in the court. The jury can consider that opinion alongside other information they have available. The opposing attorney unsuccessfully challenged the qualifications of the witness.