Answerable

The adjective 'answerable' describes a person or entity being held accountable or responsible for their actions, decisions, or obligations. It implies a duty to provide justification or explanation, particularly to a higher authority or those affected by their actions. Being Answerable suggests a potential for consequences if the responsibilities are not met. It can encompass a wide range of contexts, from financial matters and legal obligations to ethical considerations and personal relationships. It is often used in formal settings, emphasizing a clear line of accountability. The concept reinforces the importance of taking ownership and the potential repercussions of failures to do so. The degree to which someone is Answerable may vary depending on the specific context and the nature of their role or position.

Answerable meaning with examples

• As Chief Financial Officer, she was directly Answerable to the board of directors for all financial decisions. Her quarterly reports had to be meticulously documented, and she was expected to answer questions about any anomalies. Failure to do so could lead to dismissal or, in extreme cases, legal action, depending on the severity.
• The construction company was Answerable for the structural integrity of the building. They had a legal and contractual obligation to adhere to building codes and ensure the safety of the occupants. Any negligence could lead to costly lawsuits and damage to the company’s reputation if a building flaw occurs.
• The teacher was Answerable for the students' academic progress and overall well-being during class hours. They were expected to provide a safe and supportive learning environment, and to address any disciplinary issues or concerns. If a student was hurt, they were Answerable for the oversight.
• In this ethical framework, the scientists are Answerable to the research ethics committee for their experimental procedures. This means they must submit their experimental protocols and be able to defend their choices as ethical, and the welfare of any humans involved. They would also have to justify the potential harm of the outcome.
• The employee, acting on behalf of the company, was Answerable for any misrepresentations made to the client. He had the task of meeting client needs and providing accurate information. His actions, and what he said, bound the company and they would have to rectify the situation if his representations were incorrect.