Censoriously

In a manner expressing severe disapproval or criticism; in a fault-finding or harshly critical way. It implies a judgment based on morality, social standards, or perceived correctness, often implying a moral superiority on the part of the speaker or writer. The censure is frequently delivered in a tone of disdain, self-righteousness, and sometimes even bitterness. The act of speaking censoriously can also involve the silencing or suppression of ideas, opinions, or works that are deemed offensive or unacceptable.

Censoriously meaning with examples

• The critic reviewed the novel, speaking censoriously about its graphic depictions of violence and its perceived lack of moral depth. He attacked the author's choices, deeming them unnecessary and exploitative, highlighting the author's poor judgment in the characters' actions, and implying a disregard for societal values. The critic's tone resonated with indignation, showing he found the work utterly distasteful, and that it should never have been published.
• When Sarah brought her new boyfriend home, her grandmother looked censoriously at his tattoos and piercings. Her silence, as she observed his mannerisms and speech, was even more judgmental than any words could have been. Sarah braced herself for her grandmother's inevitable disapproval, knowing her traditional views would clash with her new boyfriend’s unconventional appearance and lifestyle. She felt uncomfortable from both sides.
• During the school board meeting, several parents spoke censoriously about the new curriculum, claiming it promoted ideas that were contrary to their religious beliefs. They scrutinized every lesson plan, searching for perceived errors and biases to use against the board, and made accusations of the board's failure to uphold traditional values. Their criticism was fueled by a deep-seated fear of cultural change and their view on children's exposure to outside influences.
• After the leaked emails revealed the politician’s controversial statements, the media reacted censoriously. News outlets condemned his remarks as insensitive and out of touch, and columnists lambasted his character and decision making. They presented the scandal with righteous indignation, highlighting the supposed hypocrisy and the betrayal of public trust. This intensified pressure on the politician to issue a public apology.