The adjective 'citation-less' describes a statement, work, or piece of information that lacks proper attribution or references. It indicates the absence of citations, footnotes, or other forms of acknowledging the sources used to create the work. This can apply to various forms of communication, including academic papers, news articles, legal documents, and even casual conversations. citation-less information is often considered less credible, as it doesn't allow the audience to verify the information or assess the author's research depth and validity. It may also raise concerns about plagiarism, originality, and intellectual honesty, especially within academic or professional contexts.
Citation-less meaning with examples
- The blog post, though filled with interesting ideas, was unfortunately citation-less. The readers had no way of verifying the claims made by the author or understanding where the concepts originated. Consequently, its arguments felt flimsy and its conclusions less persuasive, as a robust discussion on the topic was missing and it fell far below academic rigor.
- After the scandal, the news outlet faced heavy criticism for publishing a citation-less report on the issue. It relied heavily on anonymous sources and unsubstantiated claims which damaged the paper's credibility. Without proper references, the report fostered distrust and undermined the public's faith in the paper's reporting standards.
- During the presentation, the speaker's claims about climate change were often citation-less, which made the audience wary. Without references, the scientific accuracy of the claims and evidence could not be easily confirmed. This lack of support left the audience skeptical of the information provided, thereby undermining the whole speech.
- The lawsuit included an accusation of a citation-less presentation by the opposing counsel, implying that a large part of the opposition's key arguments had been plagiarized or were stolen from others, with no attribution made. This severely undermined the defense's case, bringing its credibility into question and damaging the reputation of the lawyer.