Contemns

To contemn is to view with disdain; to despise or treat something or someone as worthless. It involves a feeling of superiority and a strong dislike, often coupled with a lack of respect or regard. The act of contemning suggests a deliberate and conscious judgment of worthlessness, often leading to ignoring, avoiding, or even actively opposing the object of disdain. It can apply to ideas, individuals, actions, or institutions. Essentially, to contemn is to find something unworthy of attention or consideration, dismissing its value entirely. It's a powerful word indicating a profound sense of disrespect. The root of the word stems from the Latin 'contemnere' meaning 'to despise' or 'to scorn'.

Contemns meaning with examples

• The dictator contemns any form of dissent, ruthlessly crushing opposition to maintain his absolute power. He views any criticism as an act of treason and refuses to acknowledge alternative perspectives. This disdainful rejection of opposing viewpoints has isolated him and eroded his people’s basic freedoms. The dictator feels above all moral and legal constraints and has caused worldwide scrutiny. The constant condemnation has done nothing to deter his behavior.
• She contemns superficiality and shallow social interactions, preferring deep intellectual conversations and genuine connections. She views those who prioritize appearances and gossip with amusement, seeing their priorities as trivial and self-absorbed. Her values prioritize authenticity and substance, rejecting the pursuit of fleeting validation. This deep-rooted disdain for superficiality defines her personality and choices, as she cultivates meaningful relationships.
• The author's characters contemn violence, exploring the destructive consequences of aggression and conflict. Their internal struggles show the suffering and long-term trauma resulting from anger, resentment, and retribution. The characters' opposition to such actions leads them to seek peaceful solutions and foster understanding, even when confronted by provocation, making them role models for humanity.
• Many scientists and engineers contemn pseudoscientific claims, viewing them as unfounded and lacking empirical evidence. They demand rigorous methodology and validation from controlled experiments. The rejection of such claims is based on their commitment to factual accuracy and rational analysis, and can be seen as a defense of scientific integrity. They often find such beliefs to be illogical and a threat to society.