Doctrinairism

Doctrinairism is the rigid adherence to a specific doctrine, ideology, or set of beliefs, often to the exclusion of pragmatism, compromise, or consideration of alternative viewpoints. It manifests as an uncompromising insistence on the literal interpretation and application of those principles, leading to a resistance to change, adaptation, or the acceptance of dissenting opinions. Doctrinairism prioritizes abstract ideals over real-world consequences and can foster a sense of moral superiority, hindering open dialogue and fostering division. This inflexibility can lead to ineffective decision-making and social or political stagnation.

Doctrinairism meaning with examples

• The new government's unwavering adherence to free-market principles, despite economic downturn, was a clear example of doctrinairism. They refused to consider any interventionist policies, leading to widespread unemployment and social unrest. This rigid approach demonstrated a blind faith in theory over the needs of the people, ultimately damaging their credibility.
• His rejection of any scientific consensus that contradicted his religiously-based beliefs exemplified doctrinairism. He dismissed mountains of evidence in favor of his pre-conceived notions, choosing to cling to outdated dogma instead of adapting to new knowledge. This unwillingness to learn ultimately limited his understanding of the world.
• The party's Doctrinairism, particularly on social issues, alienated moderate voters. They insisted on implementing policies based on their absolute values, failing to recognize the diverse perspectives within the population, and ultimately undermined their support base. Their inflexibility proved to be a political misstep.
• The organization's uncompromising stance on non-violent resistance, even in the face of violent aggression, could be seen as a form of doctrinairism. Their adherence to a single strategy, regardless of the context, resulted in less effective outcomes and limited their options for achieving their goals. Flexibility was severely lacking.
• Their strict adherence to traditional gender roles within the family structure was a demonstration of their doctrinairism. They rejected any deviation from their prescribed norms, regardless of the practical implications or the personal desires of family members. This rigid adherence created a restrictive atmosphere for all involved.