Evader

An evader is an individual or entity that avoids or escapes from a situation, responsibility, or accountability, often in a deceptive or skillful manner. The term can refer to someone who eludes law enforcement or obligations, frequently employing cunning or strategic tactics to avoid detection or confrontation. Evaders are often characterized by their ability to maneuver through challenges, thereby evading scrutiny or punishment.

Evader meaning with examples

• The tax evader meticulously manipulated financial records to conceal his true income, successfully avoiding paying taxes for years. However, his luxurious lifestyle raised eyebrows and ultimately led to an audit. Law enforcement agencies were alerted, and the investigation unveiled the sophisticated web of deceit designed to evade the authorities.
• In a gripping thriller, the protagonist takes on the role of a skilled evader, escaping from a tightly secured facility. Using quick thinking and resourcefulness, he outsmarts guards and navigates tricky obstacles. His ability to evade capture keeps readers on the edge of their seats, showcasing a masterful blend of tension and clever evasion tactics.
• The notorious criminal was dubbed an evader by the media for his ability to slip away from law enforcement during numerous high-stakes pursuits. He was known for changing appearances and locations frequently, keeping investigators guessing. His cunning strategies became a subject of study at law enforcement seminars, highlighting the challenges of apprehending skilled evaders.
• In negotiations, an evader may try to dodge answering direct questions to maintain an upper hand. This tactic can lead to frustration among team members seeking clarity. By skillfully avoiding commitments or responsibilities, an evader can stall progress, causing tension within the group and potentially derailing the entire negotiation process.
• During the debate, the politician was labeled an evader for sidestepping pressing issues and avoiding direct answers. His frequent redirection of questions frustrated opponents and audience members alike. By evading accountability, he created a perception of dishonesty, raising concerns about his sincerity and ability to lead effectively.