Flout

Flout (verb) refers to the act of openly disregarding or showing contempt for a rule, law, or convention. It implies a lack of respect or a deliberate decision to disobey established norms or standards. The term often identifies behavior that is brazenly defiant or noncompliant, signaling an intention to challenge authority or societal expectations. Flouting can arise in various contexts, from casual daily interactions to significant legal or ethical violations.

Flout meaning with examples

• During the school assembly, several students chose to Flout the dress code by wearing casual clothing instead of adhering to the formal attire mandated by the institution. While they laughed and joked, the teachers exchanged disapproving glances, fully aware that the blatant disregard for rules could lead to disciplinary action. The act was a clear demonstration of rebellion against the norms designed to promote unity and professionalism within the academic environment.
• In a shocking display of arrogance, the politician decided to Flout environmental regulations during the construction of his new development project. Neighbors who had invested in their properties based on promises of sustainability were outraged as they witnessed the blatant dumping of waste and use of banned substances. The situation ignited protests and calls for accountability, revealing the deep divide between the community's expectations and the official's apparent disdain for the law.
• At the family gathering, Sarah chose to Flout the unspoken rule of avoiding political discussions. Despite knowing that it typically led to heated arguments and discomfort, she launched into a passionate debate about current issues, forcing others to either participate or disengage from the otherwise pleasant conversation. Her decision showcased her willingness to challenge norms in search of open dialogue, but it left some relatives unsure about how to respond to the unexpected confrontation.
• The company's CEO began to Flout workplace ethics when he announced layoffs while simultaneously awarding himself a substantial bonus. Employees watched in disbelief as he justified his actions with claims of 'business necessity,' completely disregarding the moral implications of his decisions. His behavior not only eroded trust among staff but also raised questions about corporate governance, leading many to call for more stringent regulations to prevent such blatant disregard for employee well-being.