Irremodelable

Irremodelable describes something that cannot be altered, rebuilt, or significantly changed. It signifies a state of permanence or unchangeability in its structure, form, or function. The core concept is the inability to reshape or reconstruct, emphasizing a resistance to modification. This immutability can apply to physical objects, abstract concepts, or situations. An item labeled 'irremodelable' implies that any attempt to change it would be futile, leading to the retention of its initial, inherent characteristics. The term highlights an absolute quality of being impervious to remodeling or reconstruction efforts. This might stem from inherent physical limitations, established design constraints, or immutable principles, dictating an unwavering state. It implies the essence of being unamenable to structural or functional reform.

Irremodelable meaning with examples

• The ancient Egyptian pyramids are considered irremodelable due to their massive scale, intricate construction, and historical significance. Any attempt to alter their structure would likely cause significant damage or collapse, rendering such intervention impractical. Their design is inherently set, and the resources required for modification are beyond current capacity.
• Due to the highly integrated nature of the old motherboard’s components, it was considered irremodelable. Trying to swap out or update specific parts would be a major engineering challenge. It also could make the system function worse, as they were designed for that specific model, with no adaptability to new tech.
• The terms of the treaty were declared irremodelable; the signed agreement represents a fixed compromise between nations. It also is something that cannot be renegotiated. Any attempt to alter any of its clauses would violate the diplomatic agreement established after years of negotiation, making it a document unchangeable.
• The philosophical principle of causality, within the context of a specific model of reality, is considered irremodelable. Its logical foundations mean to challenge it would undermine the entire theoretical structure, hence it would be unalterable due to the essential nature of how reality is viewed.
• Because the original software architecture was so complex and poorly documented, the software was classified as irremodelable. Any attempt to alter its core functions risked causing catastrophic failure throughout the whole system, causing it to be unusable and unmaintainable, and unchangeable.