Non-bargainable

Non-bargainable describes something that cannot be negotiated, compromised, or disputed. It signifies a condition, term, or requirement that is fixed and unyielding, leaving no room for alteration or concession. This often applies to matters of principle, established policies, or pre-determined aspects of an agreement. It implies a lack of flexibility and a definitive stance, demanding acceptance without modification. The concept underscores an unwillingness to deviate from a set standard or predetermined outcome. The context can vary widely, encompassing topics from financial conditions to ethical stances.

Non-bargainable meaning with examples

• The company's stance on employee benefits was non-bargainable. The stipulated healthcare plan and retirement contributions were fixed, leaving no room for negotiation during contract talks. Any prospective employees would have to accept the benefits as-is. The company considered them essential for employee welfare and a fundamental part of the employment package, therefore non-negotiable for all staff.
• The terms of the will included a non-bargainable distribution of assets. The testator had specified precise allocations to each heir, making the division of property unchangeable by the beneficiaries, regardless of their individual circumstances. The precise instructions were legally binding. The inheritance protocol demanded adherence to the will's mandates.
• From the ethical perspective, the commitment to truth was non-bargainable. Regardless of personal gain or societal pressure, the adherence to honesty in reporting was steadfast and unwavering. The principles of honesty and integrity were not open for debate or compromise. The integrity demanded honesty in all matters. A cornerstone of decision making.
• The deadline for submitting the project proposal was non-bargainable, established to ensure a timely review process. Late submissions would not be considered. The schedule would need to be met by all team members. This was crucial to stay on the project's timeline. Therefore, it required strict adherence to the timeline.
• The price of the artwork was non-bargainable; the artist’s gallery policy stated that the price was fixed. The established amount reflected the artist's status and the material costs. The price was based on the art's value. The gallery believed the price was justified by its investment in the quality of the art.