Power-monger

A 'power-monger' is an individual intensely driven by the desire to acquire and maintain political, social, or economic control, often at the expense of others. Their actions are typically characterized by a relentless pursuit of authority, manipulative tactics, and a willingness to exploit or disregard the well-being of those they deem obstacles to their ambitions. This craving for influence fuels their decisions, often leading to ruthless competition, abuse of power, and a disregard for ethical considerations. They are primarily concerned with personal advancement and the consolidation of their control, frequently manipulating situations to benefit themselves, displaying an insatiable appetite for dominance. They often surround themselves with sycophants and are quick to eliminate rivals, either physically or through reputational attacks.

Power-monger meaning with examples

• The ruthless dictator was a classic example of a power-monger. He suppressed all dissent, used propaganda to control the populace, and eliminated anyone who posed a threat to his iron grip on the nation. His actions were solely motivated by a desire to accumulate and retain absolute power, crushing the freedoms of his people.
• Despite his promises of reform, the politician’s actions revealed him to be a power-monger. His legislative maneuvers consistently prioritized his own authority and influence, sidelining opposition and using his position to benefit his allies, ultimately consolidating control within his own inner circle.
• The corporate CEO, known for his aggressive takeovers and hostile business tactics, was widely seen as a power-monger. He crushed competitors, exploited loopholes to maximize profit and fired anyone who questioned his decisions. His ambition and disregard for ethical principles were infamous throughout the industry.
• In the cutthroat world of academia, some professors become power-mongers. They might control research funding, publishing opportunities, and academic appointments, stifling rivals and creating an environment of fear to maintain their dominant position. These behaviors often hinder innovation and collaboration within the institution.