Researcher-reported

Relating to information, data, or findings that are gathered, documented, or communicated directly by researchers. This often contrasts with data collected from other sources such as participants, external datasets, or automated systems. The term emphasizes the active role of researchers in the creation and dissemination of the information. It implies a level of direct observation, analysis, and interpretation performed by the individuals conducting the study. The reliability of this data hinges on the researchers' methodologies, training, and potential biases.

Researcher-reported meaning with examples

• The study relied on researcher-reported observations of chimpanzee behavior, including specific social interactions and foraging strategies. Researchers spent months documenting these activities in their natural habitat. This firsthand approach allowed for detailed qualitative data, although concerns existed regarding the potential impact of the researchers' presence on the chimps. The data provided unique insights into group dynamics.
• In the survey, participants filled out questionnaires. However, the subsequent analysis and interpretation of the survey responses involved researcher-reported coding of qualitative data. The researchers used this information to classify the different topics, themes, and sentiments expressed within the participants' answers. The process added the researchers' perspective and framework to the raw survey responses.
• The clinical trial’s results were based on researcher-reported measurements of participants' physical symptoms. Trained researchers carefully measured the participants' blood pressure, heart rate, and blood glucose levels throughout the trial. This allowed for controlled collection of the data, and the data was analyzed with careful attention to data quality. The integrity of the researcher-reported data was crucial for assessing the efficacy of the new treatment.
• For this experiment, researchers developed a series of questions designed to elicit their own judgments about the artistic merit of various paintings. The results, consequently, were researcher-reported assessments. While the researchers attempted to be objective, their aesthetic sensibilities undoubtedly influenced the final results. The conclusions provide interesting insight into how researchers judge aesthetic value.