Slanderousness

Slanderousness refers to the quality of being slanderous; the malicious, false, and damaging spoken or written statements that unjustly harm a person's reputation. It encompasses the deliberate dissemination of untruths about someone, with the intent to defame and cause them harm, whether financially, socially, or emotionally. slanderousness underscores the potential for significant damage that words can inflict, highlighting the ethical and legal responsibilities attached to public pronouncements. It often involves malice and a disregard for the truth, aimed at diminishing another individual's standing within their community or field of influence. The act itself can trigger feelings of anxiety, fear, embarrassment, and anger in those who are exposed to slanderousness.

Slanderousness meaning with examples

• The journalist's articles, filled with unsubstantiated accusations and personal attacks, showcased a blatant slanderousness, relentlessly targeting the politician's personal life. This created a negative public view that was unfair and harmful to their image. Public backlash followed, with calls for the journalist to retract the misleading stories and to issue a public apology for their actions.
• The company faced accusations of slanderousness when it publicly released statements that contained false information and damaging claims about its competitor's product. This resulted in a significant drop in the competitor's sales. The court ruled in favor of the competitor, demanding financial compensation for the incurred damages and issuing a retraction of the false claims to repair the harm.
• The online forum quickly devolved into a platform rife with slanderousness, where anonymous users spread rumors and malicious gossip about various members. These comments caused distress among the forum users that were being targetted. The moderation team struggled to control the flow of misinformation and address the harm done by the unchecked spread of these defamatory statements, resulting in some users leaving.
• The defense lawyer was criticized for the overt slanderousness of their cross-examination, which involved making demeaning remarks and unsubstantiated accusations against the key witness. The judge attempted to intervene, instructing the lawyer to focus on pertinent facts. This was a clear attempt to undermine the witness's credibility and damage the jury's impression, reflecting the attorney’s disregard for justice.