Unenactable

The adjective 'unenactable' describes something that cannot be legally or officially put into effect, enforced, or ratified. It implies an inherent impossibility or a practical barrier to the passage or implementation of a law, policy, rule, or directive. This inability might stem from various factors, including a lack of constitutional support, logistical difficulties, public opposition, conflicting legislation, or simple infeasibility. It denotes a state of being incapable of being transformed into a functional or operational reality within a legal or administrative framework. The term often suggests the futility of the attempt to enact or enforce the subject matter.

Unenactable meaning with examples

• Despite fervent debate, the proposed amendment to the constitution was deemed unenactable due to a critical lack of support from a necessary supermajority of state legislatures. Legal scholars argued that the amendment violated fundamental rights and principles, making its passage practically impossible and constitutionally unsound. The inherent flaws rendered the initiative a symbolic gesture rather than a viable legislative act.
• The economic stimulus package, laden with complex and contradictory provisions, was ultimately declared unenactable by the government's finance committee. Experts pointed to a complex web of conflicting interest groups and an impossible regulatory burden, proving it impractical to implement the multitude of suggested schemes. The policy, though well-intentioned, would simply fail to solve the problems at hand in this context.
• Due to the overwhelming public dissent and logistical challenges in implementation, the nationwide surveillance program became definitively unenactable. There was a widespread breach of privacy concerns, alongside the technological impossibilities of implementation and lack of funding. Even if it could pass, the public would resist and the government would not be able to keep it running.
• The ambitious environmental protection bill, containing radical restrictions on industry emissions, was considered unenactable in the current political climate. Powerful lobbies from large corporations opposed the bill, and the economic impact of such aggressive reforms became a subject of heavy disagreement. The widespread disagreement would prove very difficult to overcome, and was seen as too radical at the current time.
• The proposed ban on all digital currencies, lacking the necessary global consensus and hampered by numerous technical obstacles, was labelled as unenactable by experts. The decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies made enforcement across all national borders nearly impossible, creating practical challenges to its implementation. The bill was deemed fundamentally flawed and completely unable to have any sort of impact.