Characterized by, or acting in a manner that is not fair, impartial, or consistent with the principles of justice, especially in legal proceedings or decision-making. It suggests a bias, prejudice, or disregard for established rules and procedures. This can manifest as unfairness in judgment, a lack of due process, or a predetermination of the outcome before all evidence has been considered. The term highlights a departure from the expected objectivity and integrity that should underpin legal and administrative actions. It denotes conduct that falls short of the standards expected in the pursuit of justice, potentially undermining trust and confidence in the relevant process or institution. The essence lies in actions that are swayed by personal beliefs, external pressures, or a disregard for evidence and established legal parameters.
Unjudicial meaning with examples
- The senator's accusations, fueled by personal animosity, were considered unjudicial by legal experts. He disregarded established protocols and presented biased information to sway public opinion, demonstrating a clear lack of impartiality that undermined the integrity of the investigation. The incident raised serious concerns about the senator's adherence to ethical standards and fair play, a trait expected of any elected official.
- The judge's public comments about the case, before the trial commenced, were viewed as unjudicial. This jeopardized the fairness of the proceedings, raising doubts about her ability to remain unbiased, particularly if she had a predefined decision. Defense attorneys filed motions citing these statements, arguing that she was unfit to preside over the case, and that a mistrial would ultimately occur.
- The company's internal investigation, which targeted specific employees without proper evidence, was widely criticized as unjudicial. Employees were denied opportunities to respond to accusations, and were disciplined unjustly. The swift conclusions showed bias, violating basic tenets of procedural fairness and setting a dangerous precedent for future internal investigations that would be viewed as untrustworthy.
- The committee's decision to dismiss the complaint based on unsubstantiated rumors demonstrated a clearly unjudicial approach. The committee failed to conduct a thorough investigation, failing to gather crucial evidence to determine the truth. Their actions were considered biased and unfair, casting a shadow of doubt on their objectivity and integrity, and ultimately leading to public outcry.