Abort
Abort refers to the act of terminating a process, plan, or operation before its completion, often in response to a perceived threat or complication. It is commonly used in medical contexts regarding pregnancy termination, but can also apply to various fields such as computing, aviation, and project management, highlighting the necessity to cease ongoing actions to prevent adverse outcomes.
Abort meaning with examples
- The pilot had to abort the landing when the visibility suddenly dropped due to heavy fog, ensuring the safety of all passengers. Despite their best efforts to follow the approach, it became clear that continuing would risk a dangerous situation, so they ascended to circle around for another try. It was a tense moment, yet essential for safety.
- In the middle of a crucial presentation, the software crashed, forcing the team to abort their demonstration. They had worked weeks on this project, but without the visual component, continuing would not effectively convey their goals. Instead, they opted to explain the features verbally while troubleshooting the technical issue, highlighting their adaptability.
- During the clinical trial, the researchers decided to abort the study when preliminary results indicated severe side effects. Patient safety was their foremost concern, so they halted the trial to reassess their methodologies and formulations. This proactive decision was necessary to prevent any further harm and ensure ethical standards were maintained throughout the research.
- When the security breach was detected, the IT department was immediately alerted to abort all ongoing transactions to protect sensitive data. Their rapid response was crucial in preventing potential financial loss and safeguarding customer information from unauthorized access. This instance emphasized the importance of having robust security protocols in place.
- After weeks of negotiations, the company chose to abort the merger due to unforeseen legal complications that arose. The legal team advised that proceeding would likely result in significant financial and reputational damage. Although disappointing, the decision was deemed wise, allowing both companies to pursue their interests independently without further entanglement.